• About
    • Our Team
    • Client Testimonials
    • Current Vacancies
  • Clearing, Collateral & Sec Finance
    • Securities Finance
    • Clearing & Collateral Strategy
    • Operating model & solution selection
    • C&C Technical Architecture
    • Implementation
  • Consultancy Services
    • Business strategy
    • Business operating model
    • RFR Transition – (L)IBOR migration
    • Brexit and Securities Finance
    • Implementation
    • Roadmapping
  • TFE-Modus
    • Methods
    • Tools
  • Case studies
  • News
  • Whitepapers
  • Careers
  • Contact
Menu
  • News
  • Whitepapers
  • Careers
  • Contact

The Field Effect

  • About
    • Our Team
    • Client Testimonials
    • Current Vacancies
  • Clearing, Collateral & Sec Finance
    • Securities Finance
    • Clearing & Collateral Strategy
    • Operating model & solution selection
    • C&C Technical Architecture
    • Implementation
  • Consultancy Services
    • Business strategy
    • Business operating model
    • RFR Transition – (L)IBOR migration
    • Brexit and Securities Finance
    • Implementation
    • Roadmapping
  • TFE-Modus
    • Methods
    • Tools
  • Case studies
Search posts
Archives
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
Home  >  News  >  Collateral speed bumps?
David Field | published on 23rd September 2015

Collateral speed bumps?

There are not one but two speed bumps coming up on the journey towards margining non-cleared OTC derivatives.

The first is the deadline for exchanging initial margin (IM) between the biggest 30-or-so sell-side players. They already exchange variation margin (VM). But IM requires a new margin model,  risk sensitivity matching to avoid disputes, connectivity to emerging utilities and other complications.  But as the deadline is postponed to September 2016 firms have had more time to adjust.

Hot on the heels of IM is the mandatory exchange of VM from March 2017. This second speed bump  introduces whole new client categories to the wonderful world of margining: FCs, NFC+ and possibly NFC-, with all the re-papering that entails, not to mention impacts on STP, liquidity, operations etc. This may have a much bigger impact.

Do you think banks will sail over these speed bumps barely spilling their cappuccino? Or will they scrape the car sills? Or worse, will the exhaust fall off…?


Posted by David Field

The Field Effect was founded and is led by David Field, an acknowledged expert in clearing and collateral management.

Related posts

Delta Capita buys securities finance consultancy The Field Effect

Find out more

The Field Effect SFTR services update December 2018

Find out more

SFTR – Call to action

Find out more

The Field Effect

  • About
    • Business expertise
    • Technology insight
    • Delivery methods and tools
    • Meet the team
  • Clearing, Collateral & Sec Finance
    • Clearing & Collateral Strategy
    • Operating model & solution selection
    • C&C Technical Architecture
    • Implementation
  • Delivery methods
    • Business strategy
    • Business operating model
    • Roadmapping
    • Implementation
  • TFE-Modus
  • Case studies
  • Careers
  • Whitepapers
  • News
  • Privacy Policy
© The Field Effect 2015 | Privacy | Designed by Eight Arms